
I couldn’t leave work fast enough to get to an opening-day screening of the latest 007 flick. Being a maniacal fan of the series since my dad let me stay up to watch THUNDERBALL one Sunday night when I was in 1st grade, I still go nuts whenever a new one is released. Yet, I won’t praise one if it doesn’t deserve it (Never Say Never Again, anyone?) and I try to keep my fan-boy head on straight when reviewing one.
I actually saved reading four reviews until AFTER I saw the film (they being from the NY Post, the NY Daily News, The Village Voice, and Entertainment Weekly). The 2 NY papers’ reviews struck me as odd: Both gave QOS the very good rating of 3 out of 4 stars, yet seemed to rip the film apart in their commentaries (The Post calling it, “Bland. James Bland. We can only hope the next chapter will deliver something that would be as hot as Keith Olbermann’s temper,” while the Daily News said, “…underwhelmed Bond fans can take solace that James Bond will return, hopefully in a better movie.” (Huhn? WHY 3 stars then?) Entertainment Weekly (despite giving it a B), claims, “SOLACE is a cold and vengeful chapter in the James Bond saga with little interest in coherence,” and finally, The Village Voice proves (once again) that the main usefulness of its film section is to get theater info: their reviewer (who’s mother probably still writes his name in his underwear) called it an “unwatchable mess,” and “…easily one of the worst in the Bond pantheon.”
Despite the confusing NY newspaper and ET reviews (let alone the Voice’s waste of ink), I didn’t find QOS difficult to follow in the least—and it’s far from the worst in the series. In fact, if not for a ridiculous (yet exciting) skydive sequence (where a parachute opens about 10 feet from the ground, with Bond and his girl walking away unscratched), and a goofy, stoned-looking villain (I mean, an environmental terrorist? After all the nuts 007 has taken on over the years? Puh-Lease!), QOS delivers the goods on a scale ALMOST as good as CASINO ROYALE. The action scenes are relentless, which surprised me considering the opening pre-credits car chase scene was routine, 007 stuff (and I admit I had the feeling this one was going to feel much longer than its brief running time). Two staples that have made 007 films so addictive are the opening action pieces trying to outdo one another (just watch how they evolved, especially with each Roger Moore entry), as well as the introduction of Bond’s latest gadgets. While the gadgets are basically gone (as compared to the older films) the series really needs to keep the openings fresh, exciting, and ABOVE what has come before it. But after the opening titles, the action comes on a level that’ll make you forget about its standard beginning (and I actually enjoyed Jack White and Alicia Key’s title song).
But it’s Daniel Craig—stone-faced, brutal, and with MAYBE a quarter-inch of a conscience—who has proven to be one of the best actors to take on the role of James Bond, which in itself is some kind of miracle (especially to a 007 purist like myself). The above mentioned reviews also ragged how “pissed and mad” Craig’s Bond is throughout SOLACE, but given its plot (the film is almost like a re-telling of the underrated Timothy Dalton entry, LICENSE TO KILL), I didn’t have any trouble with 007 being continually ticked off—and it worked like a charm when—like in Casino Royale—there’s yet another spin on the series’ famous Martini-drinking scenes.
Another element that brought a smile to my face is a sequence at a huge outdoor opera, where various members of QUANTUM meet to discuss their evil plans (muhahahahahahaha!), only to have 007, standing above the stage, taking pictures of them on his spy-phone-cam after he alerts them that they really should’ve found “a better place to meet.” Bond is actually shown SPYING, something that (while it has) occurred in most bond films, has never been done as “neatly” as in SOLACE. It’s easy to forget that Bond—especially when he’s jumping across roofs like Spider Man—is a spy, and these latest two 007films do a great job of showing his human side, which is why (I believe) they’re both doing so well (QOS has already grossed over 200 million in Europe alone).
Despite the couple of minor flaws (we must remember this is only a MOVIE folks—something too many reviewers seem to forget), QUANTUM OF SOLACE can be watched back-to-back with CASINO ROYALE for an extended 007 adventure that’ll be remembered not only as two of the best 007 films, but as two of the best spy movies (in general).
My favorite moments:
-While ducking under a car, Bond does something that I always wondered why no one did in a similar situation: he shoots one of the men shooting at him in the leg, from underneath the car! (For that little detail alone the filmmakers get a huge “’atta-boy” from this film geek).
-Bond’s brief love (actually, sex) interest, known only as “Fields,” is found covered head to toe, face down on a bed in black oil---a wonderful nod to the 007 classic GOLDFINGER (‘know what I’m talking about?). Gotta love it.
-And what has to be one of the greatest descriptions of Bond himself (in the entire series), said by the beautiful Bolivian revenge-seeker Camille (played by Olga Kurylenko) when she comes across 007 for the second or third time in the film, “There’s something horribly efficient about you.”
What a PERFECT summation of this film.
SOLACE does what (real) Bond fans crave. It takes our minds off the world for a little while (like any good film should) and throws us on a roller coaster ride that—for some of us—is worth the painful wait between films.